UK Government | Senior Money Memos

The International Consortium of British Pensioners (ICPB) had decided earlier that they would appeal a negative decision on the Frozen UK Pensions case and move to the 17-judge ECHR Grand Chamber. This appeal will now take place on September 2.

An article in the UK Telegraph outlines the case well. It is titled How saving the pound led to 54 years of injustice.

The real question is whether the appropriate resolution for these Frozen UK Pensions , should be deternined by legality, equity or morality. If it were based on equity or morality, then most observers agree on the outcome. Instead the UK Government has chosen to treat it only as a legal question and so far the answer has been no. Perhaps the ECHR on September 2 will come to a Yes view as the chairman of the earlier ECHR hearing did in his dissenting opinion. Some 500,000 UK pensioners around the world are watching with bated breath.

Other References

Technorati Tags: European Convention on Human Rights, frozen pensions, UK government

The Frozen UK Pensions Case concerns the inequity in state pension treatment for some UK pensioners. Whereas half of UK state pensioners living outside the UK have pensions that are exactly the same as those for UK residents, the other half (in Canada, Australia and South Africa and other Commonwealth countries) have pensions that are frozen at the rate that applied at the time they left the UK. The case continues to progress to what everyone hopes will be an equitable conclusion despite the opposition of the UK government.

In November 2008, although the chairman of the 6-judge Lower Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights stated that he felt the arguments put forward were right, his five colleagues did not agree. The Consortium believed that the lower chamber’s majority findings were legally flawed, in particular for treating the case as a non-contributory ‘social security’ matter rather than a contributory pension issue. Accordingly the Consortium decided to ask for a referral to the Grand Chamber.

Tony Bockman, chairman of The International Consortium of British Pensioners (ICBP), has now informed members that a panel of five judges of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has accepted that the case should be referred to the 17-judge Grand Chamber. Since only ten per cent of applications for referral to the Grand Chamber are successful, this is deemed to be a favorable sign.

The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) will hear the discrimination case on 2 September 2009. The legal action is in the hands of London human rights lawyers Timothy Otty QC and Ben Olbourne of 20 Essex Street. More details on the ECHR hearing can be found on the Pension Parity UK website. The website also provides a great deal of information documenting the facts on this most inequitable situation.

Other Previous Posts

Technorati Tags: ECHR, European Court of Human Rights, UK government

Senior Money Memos

Personal Finance From A Senior Perspective

Tag Archives: UK government

UK Frozen Pensions Case Returns To The European Court Of Human Rights (ECHR) on September 2

Frozen UK Pensions Good News – The Case Moves To The 17-judge ECHR Grand Chamber