Fair Pay For All – well, er..

No Gravatar

Yesterday, we saw what President Barack Obama is trying to do about fair pay at all levels. Repeated here without comment are two headline items today.

In the UK, there is a Stampede by banks to beat bonus crackdown as Lloyds and Barclays will both pay out millions.

Banks dependent on taxpayer support are planning to rush out hundreds of millions of pounds in bonuses to senior bankers and traders before a threatened crackdown.

As ministers prepared to curb excessive remuneration, it emerged that Barclays and Lloyds Banking Group were poised to follow Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) by paying bonuses within weeks.

Lloyds, which has taken £17 billion in rescue money from the Government, appears ready to give hundreds of millions of pounds to top executives and more junior staff.

Meanwhile in the US, the Goldman CFO notes that the Company Wants To Pay Back TARP, but it May Take Time.

Goldman Sachs, along with fellow surviving investment bank Morgan Stanley (MS) , received $10 billion from the government last year.

Goldman Sachs would like to get out from under the restrictions of the capital structure, which include some minor executive compensation restrictions.

I guess it is business as usual.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: , ,

Fair Pay For All

No Gravatar

It is good to see that President Obama’s first law concerned The fight for fair pay.

President Barack Obama’s first bill, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act he signed into law, loosens the statute of limitations under which workers can sue employers for pay discrimination based on characteristics such as gender, race, age or disability.  To ward off discrimination suits, companies will need to meticulously document pay decisions and retain detailed employment records, legal experts say.

It is rather ironic that should have been the first bill, since at the same time he is acting on salaries and compensation at the other end of the scale.

The President proposes to limit the total compensation for senior executives of those companies receiving support under the bailout arrangement.  The top brass would no longer have golden parachutes and the severance packages to those in the second tire would be limited to one year’s salary.  Although it may sound perfectly reasonable to you and me, it immediately raises criticisms from others.

For example, Carly Fiorina, former chief executive of HP, believes that Government shouldn’t decide executive pay.

Americans are outraged over excessive CEO pay and perks. That outrage is justified, particularly when American taxpayers are footing the bill.  Our capitalist system works best when there is transparency and accountability. There has been too little of both on Wall Street.

She is concerned that the proposed cap for top executive pay at $500,000 for institutions that have received bailout money is arbitrary and applies only to them.  She calls for an across-the-board approach.

  • To strengthen transparency, all aspects of CEO pay and perks should be fully disclosed on a regular basis. This should include airplanes, cars, golf-club memberships, bonuses, stock options, retirement plans and salaries — in short everything that a common-sense person would consider part of a CEO reward package.
  • To strengthen accountability, all aspects of CEO compensation should be voted on by shareholders on an annual basis.

These are very reasonable suggestions and legislation to bring them in would receive wide support.  However the President’s proposed limits send a strong message and prepare the ground for such legislation down the road.  Open government requires transparency and equity.  Fair pay for all should apply at all levels.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Search the Internet for related articles:
Loading