Best Banks

No Gravatar


Having a bank is a necessity in modern-day living, but unfortunately many people are dissatisfied with the available choices.  At the start of this year Forbes listed America’s Best And Worst Banks, but it was somewhat surprising to see what they analyzed.

With Bank of America and Citigroup buoying their balance sheets and repaying billions of dollars in taxpayer bailout funds, the casual observer might assume the banking crisis is just about over. The casual observer would be wrong.  Lots of banks are going under these days. Here are the best and worst among the 100 largest.

Busted banks are still keeping the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. busy. In the past two months, 41 went under, surpassing the total of 26 for all of 2008. What’s more, by some measures bank balance sheets are in worse shape today than they were at the height of the financial crisis.

It is of course necessary that your bank will still be there when you wish to get your money.  However that is a very minimal criterion in selecting a bank.

Unfortunately reports since then indicate that on other dimensions, banks are not doing very well. One title suggested that Customer Satisfaction With the Biggest Banks Plummets.

While customer satisfaction with banks over all remained unchanged in the fourth quarter of 2009 from the year-earlier period, customer satisfaction with some of the biggest banks has declined to the lowest fourth-quarter levels in years.  The results, from the American Consumer Satisfaction Index, back up similar findings from a Forrester Research report.  This found that customers of the biggest banks in the United States were the least likely to believe their financial institution did what was best for them as opposed to what was best for the institution’s bottom line.

A report from Reuters today shows that there is no improvement: Large bank customers  are even more dissatisfied.

Some of the largest U.S. banks were ranked very low for retail customer satisfaction.  A US marketing research company study by J.D. Power and Associates implies that as some of the biggest banks get bigger, customers may not be happy.  The three biggest U.S. retail banks — JPMorgan Chase & Co’s Chase, Citigroup’s Citibank, and Bank of America Corp’s Bank of America — consistently rank at or near the bottom for customer service in the regions they serve.

This dissatisfaction with banks and the service they provide seems to be the case wherever you look.  Here are some results from the UK on how different services rank for customer satisfaction.

According to a recent survey conducted by moneysupermarket.com, it is hairdressers and hotels that that we think provide the best service. While banks and estate agents are thought to offer the worst.  Restaurants, coffee shops, garden centres, supermarkets, clothes stores and entertainment centres such as the cinema and bowling alleys all scored highly with consumers.

Here below are the results for this year.  Compared to last year’s survey it would appear that the service provided by banks has actually got worse. Banks have dropped a place in this table.

banks customer service

The industries at the bottom of the table have all traditionally suffered a bad press. Most of them – banks, energy companies, estate agents – demand hefty fees of their customers and provide necessary and essential  services, rather than luxuries.

Unfortunately the attitude in many banks may be as Tom Peters said, that “we are no worse than the others”.  If you are looking for one of the best banks, hopefully you can find one that searches for banking excellence, which includes not only safeguarding your money but also delivering a high level of customer satisfaction.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Seniors Living Together

No Gravatar


Living together is increasingly the choice of the growing 50s and 60s crowd.

The most recent census figures suggest that older couples have little incentive to get married. There are big increases in the number of people over 50 in common-law unions, with the most significant growth in the early 60s crowd. At the same time, the practice is in decline among the 20 and 30-somethings.

Experts say that given more liberal social attitudes, a larger number of divorced and the lack of financial incentive to marry, many older Canadians simply don’t feel the need to marry.

Between 2001 and 2006, the most recent year for census data, the number of Canadians in common-law relationships shot up 77 per cent among those aged 60 to 64 and between 44 and 64 per cent for all other age groups over 50.

A US publication suggests that Cohabiting Seniors Should Protect Their Rights.

If you and your partner plan to live together without getting married, you can take a number of steps to ensure that you are protected and your wishes are followed in the event of ill health or death.

  • Sign a cohabitation agreement.
  • Provide access to health care decision making.
  • Sign a durable power of attorney.
  • Update your will.
  • Think about the tax consequences of gifts.
  • Look into registering as domestic partners.

This is an important checklist for seniors living together to consider, whatever the country they are living in.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: , , ,

RRIFs Deadline April 14 For Canadian Seniors

No Gravatar

Gordon Pape is trying to spread the word that a Deadline looms for seniors to put money back into their RRIFs.

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty granted seniors a one-time reduction of 25% in the minimum RRIF withdrawal requirement for 2008. But the country’s financial institutions had trouble getting their computer systems to accommodate the reduction. Relatively few seniors were able to take advantage of the supposed tax break.

Ottawa decided to allow people to repay up to 25% of their 2008 RRIF minimum withdrawal and claim a tax deduction for that amount. The legislation allowed for RRIF recontributions to be made up to 30 days after the law received parliamentary approval, which occurred on March 12th. Because Easter Sunday and Easter Monday fall on the 13th and 14th, Pape concludes that you have until April 14th to put money back into your RRIF.

You can check the full article for what tax savings may apply in your case.

As others have noted, normally with RRIFs, you have to get it right the first time.

At age 71, they yank away your retirement investing safety net. Arrange your registered retirement income fund (RRIF) so that you’re protected as much as possible against the kind of stock market drop we’ve seen in the past six months.  By the end of the year in which you turn 71, you must convert your registered retirement savings plan into a RRIF. With RRSPs, you have some protection if the markets go wrong. You can toss in some extra cash if you have the contribution room, and for many people there’s the comfort of knowing they have years to go before they dip into their retirement savings.

With a RRIF, however, you can’t put any new money in and you must withdraw a set minimum amount of money every year. Investing mistakes matter more with RRIFs, which means it’s crucial to build them properly at the beginning.

Financial adviser Peter Andreana suggests a 3 segment approach:

  1. A high-interest account with three years of living expenses.
  2. A somewhat riskier mix of cash, bonds and stocks.
  3. Mostly stocks, but some bonds.

As time goes by and a client starts to use up his or her cash to cover living expenses, the advice is to move some money from Segment Two into Segment One, and from Segment Three into Segment Two.

The goal is to balance the long-term growth potential of the stock market while maintaining short-term cash security. The closer you are to needing the money, the more conservative you must be.  Given the lack of flexibility in RRIFs, it seems a prudent way to cover your financial retirement needs.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: , ,

The Great Depression – The Real School Of Hard Knocks

No Gravatar

Downturn is nothing like Great Depression as the Vancouver Sun reminds us.  Canadians are ‘light years’ away from the misery of the 1930s according to many observers.

H. Blair Neatby, Professor Emeritus in the History Department at Carleton University, knows what hardship is. He grew up during the Great Depression in Saskatchewan.  He acknowledges the current recession is hurting many Canadians. But he also says today’s economic troubles are nothing compared to the severe insecurity and adversity faced by Canadians during the Great Depression.

That is an opinion shared by McGill University economist William Watson, writing in the February issue of Policy Options magazine. He says likening our current woes to the Dirty Thirties trivializes the hardships of our parents and grandparents who lived through both it and the war.  “Nothing awaiting us in 2009 is likely to rival either the 1930s when the unemployment rate rose to I in 3 or [the] blitzkrieg,” he said.  (Link to PDF version of article)

Even though the current recession may deliver knocks of somewhat lesser impact than the Great Depression, it can still be a school for useful lessons.  Blair Neatby hopes that the recession may teach younger Canadians growing up in an age of debt and leverage, a simple lesson about the value of saving.

As he said, “People like me came home from the war and became a generation of savers.  And we looked with some concern at our children and grandchildren who didn’t seem to be as concerned with the importance of saving. They hadn’t lived, as we had, through a time of great insecurity.”

Saving so as to have reserves and choices during hard times is timeless advice that is always right.  Hopefully these lessons on saving from the past will not be lost on all as they now struggle during these difficult times.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: ,

The Madoff Fraud – The Winners And Losers

No Gravatar

Today was the day to see the Madoff fraud victims and losers when Madoff was sent to jail.

Apparently not all Madoff investors were losers and some made profits.

The many Bernard Madoff investors who withdrew money from their accounts over the years are now wrestling with an ethical and legal quandary.  What they thought were profits was likely money stolen from other clients in what prosecutors are calling the largest Ponzi scheme in history.

Hundreds and maybe thousands of investors in Madoff’s funds have been withdrawing money from their accounts for many years. In many cases, those investors have withdrawn far more than their principal investment.

Such winners were probably not present on this day for the victims and losers. One loser but not a victim was clearly Bernard Madoff himself, who was remanded to jail and faces up to 150 years in prison.

At the trial, fifty courtroom seats were reserved for some of the estimated 4,000 victims of Madoff’s Ponzi scheme. Some had placed all their savings in Madoff’s firm.  Madoff, 70, pleaded guilty to charges that he swindled investors through his firm, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. None of his clients’ funds were invested in securities for more than 13 years.

Another big loser was the SEC.  As Campbell Brown said, the SEC ignored the whistle-blower in the Madoff case

The Securities and Exchange Commission completely bungled the investigation and likely cost Madoff’s victims even more money.  Although new SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro told a congressional panel that rewards might be a good way to help bring in leads, that was quite unnecessary in this case.  The SEC wouldn’t have had to shell out a dime when Harry Markopolos tried to deliver the Madoff corruption probe on a silver platter starting four years ago.

Another surprising winner according to one of the victims may be the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).  It is alleged that Madoff investors paid hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars in income taxes on phantom income that never existed.  Perhaps the Internal Revenue Service should not be allowed to keep that money.

It is certainly a tragedy of mammoth proportions, particularly for many of the victims whose lives have been irreparably damaged.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Save Or Spend In This Recession

No Gravatar

Can Canadians buy their way out of the recession? is the question posed by Parminder Parmar of CTV.ca News.  North Americans and Europeans appear to be getting mixed messages about whether they should save or spend to move the economy forward.

In the U.S., prominent members of President Barack Obama’s administration have said Americans should once again become a nation of savers — and end the era of carefree overspending. Meanwhile, in Finland, a national campaign featuring an angry looking piggy bank warns people not to feed the recession by saving.

If you want to explore further, here is a web page on President Obama’s administration ‘nation of savers’ thought.

The “Making Work Pay” tax credit, a focus of Obama’s economic stimulus bill, would become permanent. The credit is $800 for those filing jointly and $400 for individuals. It phases out for single taxpayers with $75,000 of adjusted gross income, $150,000 for joint filers.

Other increases in the budget include expansions of the earned income tax credit and child tax credit for low-income Americans, an expanded saver’s tax credit and a plan to automatically enroll people in IRAs and 401(k) plans.

As for the Finnish national campaign featuring an angry looking piggy bank, you’ll find more on that here.

University of Victoria economist Linda Welling says it’s natural for people to be concerned about the negative direction the economy appears to be heading in leading to a tightening of wallets.  So Ottawa should focus on trying to get more money into the hands of consumers to kick start the economy. A few options like offering tax rebates, extending employment insurance benefits or relaxing EI qualification requirements could boost consumer spending.  Anyone making purchases will find ready supply and really low prices.

Mehmet Dalkir, economics professor at the University of New Brunswick, feels that is only part of the answer.  The real key to getting out of the recession is to boost business spending — and the best way for the government to encourage that is by initiating public capital projects.  Without that, continuing job losses will depress overall consumer spending.

As far as consumers go, a good rule of thumb is to have six months to a year of funds to cover net expenses. If you have that, then perhaps by spending you will do yourself and the economy a real good turn.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Do-It-Yourself Pension Video

No Gravatar

The Do-It-Yourself Pension Video is a Free Resource from Kiplinger and MetLife.  The video explains how annuities can provide reliable retirement income in an uncertain economy.  It covers the US market but has some ideas that are useful wherever you live:

Nearly 80 million baby-boomers will reach retirement age over the next 20 years–almost 10,000 Americans a day. With a volatile market battering 401(k)s and fewer traditional pension plans, there is growing interest in how immediate annuities can fit into a retirement plan and provide guaranteed lifetime income. Financial publisher Kiplinger unveils an educational video explaining this powerful tool. Entitled “Your Do-It-Yourself Pension”, the 27-minute video notes the types of annuities available, explains how they work, and gives guidance on how to choose one that suits particular individual or family needs.

The video is featured on the Kiplinger Web site at www.kiplinger.com/links/annuityvideo.
and there are 5 episodes:

  • Episode 1: Introduction to Annuities
  • Episode 2: Exploring Different Types of Annuities
  • Episode 3: How Annuities Work
  • Episode 4: Choices … And How to Choose
  • Episode 5: Final Points

To whet your appetite for the Do-It-Yourself Pension video, here is Episode 1: Introduction to Annuities.



The Kiplinger website also features Kip Tips.  It offers Advice to help you prosper and covers a variety of useful topics:

  • Books on Money
  • Career Wise
  • Consumer Rights, Recalls, More
  • Family Matters From Cradle to Grave
  • Financial Resolutions for 2009
  • Funding Retirement Dreams
  • Insurance Made Simple
  • Investing for Non-Experts
  • Money Tasks 101: Get It Done Fast
  • On Your Mind
  • Our Personal Finance Magazine
  • Real Estate, Mortgages, Home Improvement
  • Recommended Web Sites
  • Smart Saving and Spending
  • Straight Talk on Taxes
  • Success with Credit, Budgets, Planning
  • Sustainable Living
  • Test Your Wits

It is one personal finance and retirement website that is certainly well worth bookmarking.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Looking After Seniors

No Gravatar

Helping mom with retirement from Money CNN suggests that if a parent isn’t on the ball with their own retirement planning, it may be time for you to step in.

The issue of what adult children can and should do to help assure that their parents are financially prepared for retirement is one that’s getting more attention as life spans increase and we become increasingly reliant on our personal savings to fund our post-career lives.

Typically, this question comes from baby boomers who, already squeezed by simultaneously saving for retirement and paying school and other child-rearing costs, now face the prospect of also having to provide financial assistance to retired parents. A global study  by The Hartford found that more than a quarter of Americans 45 and older say they are currently caring for both children and parents or older relatives. Given how badly the retirement savings of many retirees have been hit by the market meltdown, that number has probably already increased or will over the next few years.

Statistics Canada has an article, Looking after seniors: Who does what for whom?  It discusses who provides care to our aging population, and how can we best support them? It examines caregivers aged 45 to 64 and those 65 and over, and the particular issues that affect each group.  In all probability it is an issue that we all may be faced with.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: , ,