Paradise Lost, Milton

No Gravatar

If we were only talking about the book, there would be little hardship involved. Unfortunately it could be used to label the latest Ponzi scheme in Canada as we read that Businessman missing as Dutch Canadians out millions.

At least 80 elderly Dutch Canadians trusted Harry Snoek Jr. with their life savings. But the money is gone. And so is Harry, possibly back in the Netherlands or maybe Qatar, leaving a trail of empty promises and despair in his wake.

By the latest tally of those who have come forward and who are trying in Ontario courts to recoup their losses, Snoek has absconded with more than $34 million. The total number of affected investors may be as high as 200.

Promissory notes and court documents obtained as part of a Toronto Star investigation, as well as interviews of investors and business partners, suggest Snoek ran a Ponzi scheme, where early investors are paid off from the contributions of later ones. The RCMP is looking into the case.

Troubling payment delays from Snoek started in 2007 with Snoek exploiting shared ties to motherland and church to ease anxieties and keep their money just a few months more, and then another few months more.

In a lawsuit filed in Brantford, a receiver was appointed who is combing through Snoek company files. The receiver may try to sell Snoek properties in Milton and spread the proceeds to investors. But it is believed that the land will fetch only a fraction of what Snoek owes.

Unfortunately paradise will not be regained.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Forever Young But Too Old To Rent A Car

No Gravatar

‘Forever Young’ is the kind of magazine you will be seeing more of on city streets:

LAS CRUCES – It’s about “the joy of life after 50,” and you’ll find it on local newsstands today. Forever Young is a free monthly magazine catering to area seniors. “Las Cruces is a prime retirement community.  Our senior population is large, active and ready for adventure – that’s FY’s premise.  Too many seniors’ magazines are all about the woes of old age. Not us. We’re about people enjoying the life they’ve worked so hard to achieve.”

It is all part of the changing demographics.  Seniors are living longer, they’re staying fitter and they are traveling more.  Often that can be by coach but many wish to maintain their independence and travel by automobile.  Although a small car may be adequate for traveling in your local neighborhood, something bigger is more appropriate when covering the miles.  If so seniors may be renting bigger cars or RVs for greater comfort.

rv

Even though they may be fitter and healthier than their parents, they should be aware that sometimes regulations and practices are not keeping up with the times.  For example there are often rental car age limits in Europe.  Before you commit to a driving trip in Europe, make sure all the drivers in your party conform to local requirements. Although those requirements are generally similar to what you find at home, a few may surprise you.

In several countries, some car rental companies impose maximum age limits for rentals, generally, or for rentals of some models of cars:

  • Denmark: Some rental agencies impose a maximum age of 80.
  • Slovenia: Some rental agencies impose a maximum age limit of 73, and renters ages 70 to 73 may face surcharges.
  • Czech Republic, Greece, Poland, Romania and Slovakia: Some rental agencies impose a maximum age of 70.
  • United Kingdom: Some rental agencies apply an extra fee for travelers age 70 or over; some rental agencies apply a maximum age limit of 69 on some car classes.
  • Ireland (Republic): Rental agencies bar anyone over 75 from renting a car

It’s all points to the need to carefully preplanned your trip.  For car rental you should make sure you are aware of all the suppliers who may meet your needs and seek out the car hire package that will work best for you.  You may well be ready for adventure but to enjoy that you should make sure that all your arrangements will fall into place without a hitch.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Having Choices Avoids Depression

No Gravatar

One of our favorite thought leaders is in the news again. We wrote about her in an article entitled The Fewer The Better and Sheena Iyengar, an associate professor of management at Columbia University’s business school, was talking about ‘choice overload‘. The crux of the matter is that too many options will either paralyse the chooser or may mean an unsatisfactory choice is made to get out of the choice dilemma.

Now she is back in the news again with her new book, The Art Of Choosing. Particularly for seniors one of her findings is of interest. That is that no choice at all can lead to depression.


As Iyengar makes clear in a page-turning narrative that blends academic rigor with a pop culture sensibility, belief in the power of choice and a strong desire to expand choices has long been part of the American Dream. “[T]he power of choice is so great,’’ she writes, “that it becomes not merely a means to an end [i.e., reaching the best decision] but something intrinsically valuable and necessary.’’

She cites a fascinating British study that found that employees who feel less control over their work have higher levels of stress. The ability to make choices about our work and life seems to be an essential part of psychological well-being. People who perceive themselves as lacking control “are at a higher risk for depression than those who believe they have control,’’ writes Iyengar of the devastating impact of losing control over our lives.

Some advice written for lawyers as it happens may well help in such situations. Prevent Depression By Learning To Be A Satisficer Instead Of A Maximizer. That advice comes from another writer on choosing and choices. Barry Schwartz, the Dorwin Cartwright Professor at Swarthmore College, has written a marvelous book titled The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less, which provides one solid strategy. He suggests that being a satisficer will protect you against depression while being a maximizer will increase your vulnerability to depression.

If you always yearn for the impossible dream then as Dr. Martin Seligman suggested you may find that your depression results from learned helplessness. A person who suffers from learned helplessness has formed the belief that nothing he does can overcome the challenging circumstances he faces in life or reverse the set backs that life has imposed on him. Working within the choices you have and selecting something that works for you is the very best way to avoid locking in depression.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: , ,

Taxes Add Insult To Injury For Ponzi Victims

No Gravatar

If you have income, then you must pay taxes. That is true even when that income may be only what a Ponzi schemer may have reported to you. That is unfortunately the situation in which the Montréal victims of Earl Jones now find themselves.

Apparently the Quebec tax authorities will try to lighten the tax burden on Jones’s victims even though many should have no tax burden since the income was illusory.

Victims of financial fraudster Earl Jones won’t have to pay taxes on investment income they didn’t actually earn, Quebec Revenue Minister Robert Dutil announced. Jones’s victims will also be able claim a deduction for lost revenues, Dutil said in a statement. “I sympathize with these people who are going through a deplorable situation, and I want to clarify this to help avoid all confusion for these victims,” he said.

When someone is in a precarious financial situation and unable to meet their obligations, the agency follows their case closely in line with the information available.

Some of the fraudster’s victims are finding at the federal level that things are moving more slowly and there are delays in getting some relief for taxes they paid on fictitious income.

Kevin Curran, a member of the Earl Jones Victims Organizing Committee, says the government told victims last summer to file adjusted tax returns for previous years stating that the fake income provided to them by Mr. Jones was erroneously reported, at which point they would receive tax refunds. Many of the more than 150 victims did so, but despite a promise to move swiftly, they are still waiting for their tax returns. Some of these people are struggling to afford daily living expenses. Furthermore, a handful of the victims that would qualify for increased government pensions cannot get them because their income is still wrongly pegged as being too high.

Last year in the United States, the Ponzi Scheme victims of Bernie Madoff received somewhat faster tax breaks although the public resentment about the support the troubled banks were getting may have created a more favorable climate for speedy action.

The Internal Revenue Service announced unprecedented tax relief for victims of Ponzi schemes, saying many of those affected could deduct up to 95% of their losses immediately. The move represents a significant relaxation of longstanding limits on tax relief for victims of investment scams. It reflects the pressure officials are feeling to help individuals who have been hurt in the current financial crisis, when public resentment is growing over the billions of dollars the government is directing into troubled banks and other big corporations.

Meanwhile it is good to see that vigorous action is being taken to prosecute those who perpetrated these dreadful schemes. The Feds are targeting Bernie Madoff’s brother and sons for Tax Fraud.

Last summer, prosecutors essentially made clear they wouldn’t go after Bernie’s wife, Ruth. But that’s not the case in regard to his brother, Peter, or his sons, Mark and Andrew. It is reported that federal tax-fraud prosecutors in Manhattan are pursuing cases against Bernard Madoff’s brother and sons.

To add to this sorry tale of woe, it now appears that there is a Bogus Web Site Reportedly Trying to Rip Off Madoff Victims

A bogus Web site is targeting victims of Bernard Madoff’s record Ponzi scheme in an apparent identity-theft scam, the Securities Investor Protection Corp warned today, The New York Post reported. The site claims that $1.3 billion in Madoff money was recently found hidden in Malaysia, and displays photos of huge stacks of cash allegedly stashed by the mega-crook. The so-called “International Securities Investor Protection Corporation” urges burned investors to submit claims by filling out an online form and mailing in a copy of “your most recent brokerage account statement.”

The site rips off design elements of the real SIPC site. The SIPC wants to be as clear as possible that Madoff victims and other investors should not share any personal financial information via this Web site or rely upon it as an information source.

One would hope that these poor victims have gone through enough to realize that once bitten requires them to be twice shy.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Google Offers Credit Card Comparisons

No Gravatar

Google has up till now presented free (organic) search results accompanied by sponsored results.  The credit card comparison it now offers in the UK represents a significant departure.  As is noted in the footer:

Actual rates and other information may vary. Sponsored results shown only include participating credit card issuers. When you click on a card’s “Apply Now” link, the information you entered on this page will be shared with the issuer.

This new Google initiative is drawing the inevitable adverse criticism from the competition.  Here is how Moneysupermarket.com describes the additional values it brings to such credit card comparisons:

moneysupermarket.com’s successful formula comes from helping customers find the right card for them, with the option to search the whole credit card market, whilst providing help and support, such as independent reviews, to guide the customer’s decision making process.

In this latest move Google has abandoned its successful search model which comes from showing customers a combination of whole of market results, ordered by what is most relevant, plus sponsored results based on how much the advertiser pays. In this test they are simply listing cards that are prepared to pay to advertise, regardless of whether they are a great deal for customers. We are disappointed that Google has chosen to only feature sponsored products in this solution with nothing to support customers.

As well as seeing just a fraction of the credit card market customers who use this Google tool whilst it is in trial will miss out on at least one fantastic exclusive card coming soon only to moneysupermarket.com.

Paul Carpenter has a different concern about the Google credit card comparison website:

Verticals and niches are, to me at least, all about domain expertise and experience and I rely on brand perception to tell me where to find that.  As Google races against Bing to operate in verticals like this, it will be interesting to see whether its brand will resonate outside its core function. I suspect not, and I really don’t know why the tech market is so fetishistic about this stuff. Would you buy Coke jeans, or Marlboro branded microwave meals? Brands that are malleable enough to cross boundaries are vanishingly rare – an honourable exception being Virgin, who work in everything from cruises to space travel.

Clearly this test is very different from search activities that Google has worked on in the past.  Whatever the result of this test, it has big implications for where Google will be putting its efforts.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: , ,

Search the Internet for related articles:
Loading